Sophocles, fr. 965
“I am called Odysseus for evil deeds correctly:
For many who have been my enemy hate me.”
ὀρθῶς δ’ ᾿Οδυσσεύς εἰμ’ ἐπώνυμος κακῶν•
πολλοὶ γὰρ ὠδύσαντο δυσμενεῖς ἐμοί
Yesterday, I was editing a manuscript and thinking about Odysseus’ so-called “lying tales” in books 13-20 of the Odyssey. In one of them, he talks casually about murdering the son of Idomeneus. A song burst fully formed into my head. I made a poll. Over 3500 people voted.
#ClassicsTwitter #Literati #Heroes
Who is more likely to have "Killed a man in Reno, Just to watch him die"?
— sententiae antiquae (@sentantiq) June 27, 2019
(And, yes, as twitter let me know, it should be “shot” not killed”). To be honest, I thought the answer was clear and tried to direct it a bit:
Personally, I think it is Odysseus. He is soulless, dead-eyed killer who does something just to see what happens. Achilles has big feelings. And his big feelings lead to murder sprees. But he feels remorse sometimes.
— sententiae antiquae (@sentantiq) June 27, 2019
And I was not the only one to consider Odysseus’ character the crueler one:
https://twitter.com/NeolithicSheep/status/1144251597511385088
Also, now that people are taking this way to seriously. Johnny Cash just sang about shooting a man in Reno just to watch him die. He told this as part of a performative persona.
Let's guess whether Achilles or Odysseus is more likely to do the same….
— sententiae antiquae (@sentantiq) June 27, 2019
I suspect that the issue here for most voters was really: who’s your favorite hero and who seems violent to you. Everyone knows Achilles is a cross between the Hulk and Superman and he just kills everything. Most people forget that Odysseus leaves a trail of slaughter in his wake too.
Earlier polls I have run seem to indicate that while the Iliad and Odyssey are pretty close in popularity people have a more positive view of Odysseus. I have spent several years working on a book on Odysseus (after working on the Iliad for over a decade). I think these evaluations of the characters are from an overall feeling and not an actual engagement with the texts.
I continued this conversation on and off line with Justin Arft:
This is the greatest Odysseus burn ever https://t.co/d9kvgnHjW7
— Elizabeth Davis (@E_Davis_Romance) June 28, 2019
Erik, who is in Germany, had some comforting words over text:

I received another text from an actual resident of Reno, who had some thoughts:

My emotional stability did not increase during the day:
So far, there are 999 votes on this and 52% of them are a problem.
— sententiae antiquae (@sentantiq) June 27, 2019
There were some cogent responses:
To everyone saying Odysseus is the obviously right answer, Achilles came back from the dead just to watch Polyxena die…
— Graham Butler (@hikergraham) June 27, 2019
Achilles is intense, like super intense, like there is extra and then there is Achilles extra. He gets his feelings hurt and then asks for Zeus to make his own people die. Patroklos dies because Achilles is so damn sensitive. Achilles’ rage is the point of the whole poem. But he is not calculating. He feels. He reacts. He regrets.
But behind all the arguments is a basic misunderstanding of what it means to be a hero in ancient Greece. They are not simple figures. They are not heroic in the modern sense. The word heros: can mean a man in the prime of his youth; or, a member of a race of superpeople before our current race of mortals; or, a person who follows a particular narrative/paradigmatic arc. It is value neutral when it comes to “good” and “evil”.
Erwin Cook writes well about this, noting that what marks heroes out in Greek myth and poetry is their ability to suffer or cause suffering to others.
Fortunately for the next 24 hours I found like-minded people to suffer with:
53% of this poll cannot be serious https://t.co/6xX0uwysla
— Joanna L. Cresswell 🌞 (@JoannaCresswell) June 28, 2019
Despite Achilles’ constant lead, there was a chorus of objection:
This seems so obviously Odysseus that I didn't even understand the point of the question…and then he's losing! This is a guy who lied to his father and said he was dead for literally no reason. This is a guy who threatened his nurse with a cruel death.
— Andrew Szilvasy (@AndrewSzilvasy) June 27, 2019
https://twitter.com/braak/status/1144243133376581633
'Scheria is clearly Reno, which I will prove by parshing the text of the Odyssey for hitherto overlooked clues…'
— Theo Nash (@theo_nash) June 27, 2019
My friend Sean texted this morning with the most plausible explanation for the outcome:

https://twitter.com/emmatonkin/status/1144579906191396864
https://twitter.com/RasBabaO/status/1144245260660330497
https://twitter.com/DavidNussman/status/1144274604619370497
And I think people just didn’t get the question:
https://twitter.com/ScottLepisto/status/1144244195902808064
But, come on, Odysseus kills 108 unarmed people, has the enslave-women hanged and does many other totally questionable things in his epic. In the Iliad, he lies to Dolon and has Diomedes kill him after he has informed on the Trojans. He’s a dark mage, a necromancer! And even the Odyssey is deeply ambivalent about his crimes: Teiresias implies that the suitors are only in Ithaca because of Odysseus’ mistakes! The epic ends with the people of Ithaca splitting a vote whether to try to kill him or not.
Outside of the epics: he frames Palamedes and has him stoned to death; he tricks Achilles into coming to war; he strands Philoktetes for being wounded and then gets him to come back to Troy; he tries to stab Diomedes in the back; he is known for arranging for the killing of Astyanax. He probably killed Hecuba too.
He is also known in later traditions for wanting to kill Telemachus. Otherwise, he’s busy in myth having children all over the Mediterranean. When he gets home, he cries about his dog but not his wife.
Don’t get me wrong, I think Odysseus is important, but Emily Wilson is totally right in saying he is a “complicated man”. He is a survivor- and he teaches us about the compromises one must make and risks one needs take to survive. He is not a hero, he is not divine. He is like us. And this is not always good. He minimizes slavery and manipulates his slaves, he is definitely more into truthiness than truth. And he is his own worst enemy: he needs to figure this out before he can even start to go home.
Achilles’ rage is big and easy to conceptualize, easier to blame; Odysseus’ calculation is harder to understand and frame. We want to be like Achilles, I think, because we can blame our faults on emotions. That’s nature, right? We can’t control nature! It is harder to admit where we are like Odysseus because then we need to take responsibility for our faults. People who love Odysseus too often explain away his faults. (Which is why so much of Homeric scholarship refuses to acknowledge that Odysseus is crossing a line in killing the enslaved women, the suitors, blinding Polyphemos and more).
Not everything was about bashing Odysseus:
Achilles' wrath is to me petulant, vengeful; the disinterested curious turn to violence that that Cash line (remorsefully??) recalls seems to me closer to Odysseus's characteristic empathetic seeing-from-another's-eyes. Only twisted in a as-boys-are-to-flies moment, of course.
— deadgod (@equiprimordial) June 28, 2019
Given that the Cash lyric is very much done in a persona, I think that Odysseus – the more mercurial of the two – is more likely to adopt a similar persona.
— Dr Crom (@DocCrom) June 27, 2019
https://twitter.com/TheWeaseKing/status/1144271478248091648
And some people worked hard to bring greater context to the song and the identification:
https://twitter.com/bc4503/status/1144279491839242246
now we're playing a better game.
— sententiae antiquae (@sentantiq) June 27, 2019
This probably undermines the entire enterprise:
Or promise him he’d be spared and kill him after he served his purpose!
— Wretched Soup (@WretchedSoup) June 27, 2019
Some people couldn’t play the game right!
Odysseus, unless this is a trick question and the answer is Alcibiades.
— Toph Marshall (@Tophocles) June 27, 2019
https://twitter.com/gemmagreene16/status/1144260781665652736
https://twitter.com/DLVLK/status/1144268767393976322
https://twitter.com/CM_Whiting/status/1144586223203340291
There may have been some salutary effects:
That is a winning take
— sententiae antiquae (@sentantiq) June 28, 2019
All this "Achilles is an Extra Boi overflowing with Feels" makes me want to read the Iliad for the first time since high school. https://t.co/ugG5vR5n4l
— Maja Bäckvall (@SkrivaFel) June 28, 2019
Thanks for this great summary. I went for Achilles (despite his later, clear remorse, the dragging of Hector’s body has always bothered me) but do truly understand the arguments for Odysseus. The back-and-forth was stimulating and, at least for me, educational.
— James (Randy) Fromm supports 🏳️🌈🇺🇦 (@randy_fromm) June 28, 2019

thanks to everyone who played along and took what was a lark seriously. Apologies to all the wits and wiseacres I didn’t include in this post. The thread on twitter is pretty cool. But, as with everything, Plato did it first and better.
Plato, Hippias Minor
364c
“Homer made Achilles the best man of those who went to Troy, Nestor the wisest, and Odysseus the most shifty.”
φημὶ γὰρ Ὅμηρον πεποιηκέναι ἄριστον μὲν ἄνδρα Ἀχιλλέα τῶν εἰς Τροίαν ἀφικομένων, σοφώτατον δὲ Νέστορα, πολυτροπώτατον δὲ Ὀδυσσέα.
365b
“Achilles is true and simple; Odysseus is shifty and false.”
ὡς ὁ μὲν Ἀχιλλεὺς εἴη ἀληθής τε καὶ ἁπλοῦς, ὁ δὲ Ὀδυσσεὺς πολύπροπός τε καὶ ψευδής
366a
Soc. “People who are many-wayed are deceptive because of their foolishness and thoughtlessness, or because of wickedness and some thought?
Hippias: Most of all, because of wickedness and intelligence.
Soc. So, it seems, they are really intelligent.
Hip. Yes, by Zeus, wicked smart.
Soc. And men who are smart—are they ignorant of what they do or do they understand it?
Hip. They really understand what they are doing. For this reason, they also do evil.
Soc. So, is it the ignorant or the wise who know these things which they understand?
Hip. The wise know these very things, how to deceive.
—ΣΩ. Πολύτροποι δ’ εἰσὶ καὶ ἀπατεῶνες ὑπὸ ἠλιθιότητος καὶ ἀφροσύνης, ἢ ὑπὸ πανουργίας καὶ φρονήσεώς τινος;
—ΙΠ. ῾Υπὸ πανουργίας πάντων μάλιστα καὶ φρονήσεως.
—ΣΩ. Φρόνιμοι μὲν ἄρα εἰσίν, ὡς ἔοικεν.
—ΙΠ. Ναὶ μὰ Δία, λίαν γε.
—ΣΩ. Φρόνιμοι δὲ ὄντες οὐκ ἐπίστανται ὅτι ποιοῦσιν, ἢ ἐπίστανται; —
—ΙΠ. Καὶ μάλα σφόδρα ἐπίστανται· διὰ ταῦτα καὶ κακουργοῦσιν.
—ΣΩ. ᾿Επιστάμενοι δὲ ταῦτα ἃ ἐπίστανται πότερον ἀμαθεῖς εἰσιν ἢ σοφοί;
—ΙΠ. Σοφοὶ μὲν οὖν αὐτά γε ταῦτα, ἐξαπατᾶν.
Well, I *thought* I got the question: when I wrote “Odysseus wouldn’t kill you without a reason. Like he wanted your stuff, or thought you were a bad house-guest.” I intended to suggest that he’d kill you for reasons only a psychopath would think justified it (and so was the more likely to do it just to watch you die). Oh well.